Efektivitas Blended Learning terhadap Hasil Belajar Sains: Systematic Literature Review

I Wayan Karmana

doi:10.36312/panthera.v6i3.1880

Authors

I Wayan Karmana Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, Fakultas Sains, Teknik, dan Terapan, Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika, Jalan Pemuda Nomor 59A, Mataram, Nusa Tenggara Barat 83125, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36312/panthera.v6i3.1880

Keywords:

Blended Learning, Science Learning Outcomes, Science Learning, Systematic Literature Review, Science Education

Abstract

Blended learning is a learning model that integrates face-to-face learning with online learning to create a more flexible, interactive, and student-centered learning experience. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of blended learning on science learning outcomes through the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach. The study was carried out by referring to the PRISMA guidelines through the stages of identification, screening, feasibility assessment, and inclusion. Literature searches were conducted on Scopus, ScienceDirect, ERIC, Google Scholar, and SpringerLink databases with a publication range of 2019–2025. Based on the selection process, as many as 19 articles met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed using narrative synthesis. The results showed that 84.2% of studies reported that blended learning significantly improved science learning outcomes compared to conventional learning, while 15.8% of studies found no significant difference despite showing an increase in student motivation, engagement, and learning satisfaction. In addition to improving cognitive learning outcomes, blended learning also contributes to improving critical thinking skills, problem solving, science literacy, science process skills, and learning independence. The effectiveness of the implementation of blended learning is influenced by the quality of learning design, teacher competence, student readiness, and technological infrastructure support. These findings show that blended learning is an effective learning strategy to improve the quality of science learning at various levels of education, with the record that its implementation is supported by systematic planning and optimal use of technology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2006). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. Pfeiffer.

Branch, R. M., & Dousay, T. A. (2015). Survey of instructional design models (5th ed.). Association for Educational Communications and Technology.

Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. Jossey-Bass.

Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (3rd ed., pp. 333–350). Routledge.

Hrastinski, S. (2019). What do we mean by blended learning? TechTrends, 63(5), 564–569.

Khalil, M., & Ebner, M. (2020). Learning analytics: Principles and constraints. In D. Burgos (Ed.), Radical solutions for education in a crisis context (pp. 3–17). Springer.

Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. EBSE Technical Report, Keele University.

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1–47.

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71.

Poon, J. (2013). Blended learning: An institutional approach for enhancing students' learning experiences. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 271–288.

Singh, H. (2003). Building effective blended learning programs. Educational Technology, 43(6), 51–54.

Staker, H., & Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying K–12 blended learning. Innosight Institute.

Tamim, R. M., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P. C., & Schmid, R. F. (2011). What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning: A second-order meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 4–28.

UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing.

Vo, H. M., Zhu, C., & Diep, N. A. (2017). The effect of blended learning on student performance at course level in higher education: A meta-analysis. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53, 17–28.

Wang, Q., Huang, C., & Quek, C. L. (2018). Students' perspectives on the design and implementation of blended learning in science education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(2), 1–16.

Wulandari, A., & Surjono, H. D. (2019). The effectiveness of blended learning on improving students' learning achievement in science education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1), 012089.

Zainuddin, Z., & Keumala, C. M. (2018). Blended learning method within Indonesian higher education institutions. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 6(2), 69–77.

Zhao, Y., Lei, J., Yan, B., Lai, C., & Tan, H. S. (2005). What makes the difference? A practical analysis of research on the effectiveness of distance education. Teachers College Record, 107(8), 1836–1884.