An Educational Evaluation Model to Strengthen Institutional Accountability and Quality through a Systematic Literature Review Approach

Syahrir Syahrir; A. Fandir

doi:10.36312/panthera.v5i4.760

Authors

Syahrir Syahrir Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Science, Engineering, and Applied Sciences, Mandalika University of Education, Pemuda Street Number 59A, Mataram, West Nusa Tenggara 83125, Indonesia
A. Fandir Lombok Business Academy, Tanjung-Medana Street, North Lombok, West Nusa Tenggara 83352, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36312/panthera.v5i4.760

Keywords:

Accountability, Digital Transformation, Educational Evaluation, Evaluation Models

Abstract

Educational evaluation plays a strategic role in strengthening public accountability and enhancing institutional interrelationships amidst the acceleration of digital transformation. This study addresses the urgent need to explore how various evaluation models can effectively interact with technology and educational governance to create an adaptive, transparent, and sustainable quality assurance system. This research aims to synthesize dominant and relevant educational evaluation models across contexts and uncover the effectiveness of their implementation in the digital era. Using the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method guided by PRISMA 2020, this study went through four main stages: identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion. A total of 22 articles from Scopus and Web of Science for the 2022-2025 period were analyzed thematically. The findings revealed four prominent evaluation models: CIPP, Artificial Intelligence-Based (AI-Based) evaluation, participatory evaluation, and evidence-based evaluation. These four models emphasize a paradigm shift in evaluation systems toward data-driven, collaborative, and technology-integrated ones. Practically, this study confirms that the successful integration of evaluation models and digital technology is highly dependent on governance readiness, human resource capacity, and data-driven decision-making mechanisms. These implications form an important basis for educational institutions to strengthen evaluation systems that are responsive to change and oriented towards increasing sustainability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alaimo, G., & Kelly, C. (2025). School Staffs’ Views on Student Non-Attendance: A Systematic Literature Review. Frontiers in Education, 10(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1599065

Appels, W., Nilsen, T., & van der Linden, D. (2022). Educational Quality in Secondary Analyses of International Large-Scale Assessments: A Systematic Review. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 34(4), 517-541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-022-09397-9

Campbell, A. L., Jenkins, R., & Taylor, J. (2024). Assessing the Effectiveness of Academic Coaching in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(5), 587-605. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2024.2417173

Cao, Y., Yao, X., & Zhang, G. (2025). How to Assess Global Education Quality: The Global Education Quality Index and its Cross-National Comparisons. Ecnu Review of Education, 8(3), 779-802. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311251331107

Chan, C. K. Y., Zhang, Y., & Tang, H. (2023). Student Partnership in Assessment in Higher Education: A Systematic Review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(9), 1253-1278. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2224948

Cui, Y., Zhang, H., & Lee, M. (2023). Data Literacy Assessments: A Systematic Literature Review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 30(5), 643-667. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2023.2182737

Dulas, H., Bowman‐Perrott, L., Georgio, T., Dunn, C., & Li, Y. (2025). Increasing Prosocial Employment Skills for Adolescents with Emotional and/or Behavioral Disorders: A Systematic Review and Quality Review. Behavioral Disorders, 50(4), 213-225. https://doi.org/10.1177/01987429251314384

Erliani, S., Azzahra, A., Nasution, I., Rahayu, P., Maulana, M., Fathurrahman, O., & Amanda, S. (2024). The Role of Educational Program Evaluation in Optimizing the Quality of Learning at MA Nurul Fadhilah. Alacrity : Journal of Education, 4(2), 45-51. https://doi.org/10.52121/alacrity.v4i2.303

Evangelou, S. M., & Xenos, M. (2025). Peer Assessment in Education: A Seven-Year Implementation and Iterative Development of a Customizable Digital Tool. Next Research, 2(4), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexres.2025.101000

Fink, G., Jack, B. K., & Masiye, F. (2020). Seasonal Liquidity, Rural Labor Markets, and Agricultural Production. American Economic Review, 110(11), 3351-3392. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20180607

Frizell, C., Graham, D., DuVentre, A., & Brown, S. (2024). Embracing Neuro-Inclusivity Within Physician Assistant/Associate Education: Challenging Organizational Cultural Norms and Navigating Communication Challenges. The Journal of Physician Assistant Education, 36(1), 102-106. https://doi.org/10.1097/jpa.0000000000000575

Fukaya, T., Nakamura, D., Kitayama, Y., & Nakagoshi, T. (2024). Intervention Effectiveness for Promoting Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Education, 9(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1435758

Gao, X., Noroozi, O., Gulikers, J. T. M., Biemans, H. J. A., & Banihashem, S. K. (2024). A Systematic Review of the Key Components of Online Peer Feedback Practices in Higher Education. Educational Research Review, 42(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100588

Gnawali, Y. P. (2024). Paradigm Shift in Mathematics Education. Janajyoti Journal, 2(1), 29-47. https://doi.org/10.3126/jj.v2i1.68308

Guerrero-Quiñonez, A., Guagua, O., Quiñonez-Alava, M., & Barrera-Proaño, R. (2023). The Evaluation of Teaching Performance in Ecuadorian Higher Education. Ibero-American : Journal of Education & Society Research, 3(1), 249-253. https://doi.org/10.56183/iberoeds.v3i1.624

Hassan, M. M., & Ahmad, A. R. (2025). Systematic Literature Review on the Sustainability of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs): Dimensions, Practices and Research Gaps. Cogent Education, 12(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2549789

Hattingh, S., & Northcote, M. (2023). Personalising Online Assessments: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 47(10), 1420-1436. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2023.2250743

Hernández-Atilano, A. A., Lopez Collado, J., Platas-Rosado, D. E., & Andres-Meza, P. (2025). Potential Distribution of Two Insects with Gastronomic Value in Mexico. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, 28(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.56369/tsaes.6278

Iliichuk, L. (2023). Institutional Audit as a Key Instrument for Ensuring the Quality of Education. Mountain School of Ukrainian Carpaty, 29(1), 11-16. https://doi.org/10.15330/msuc.2023.29.11-16

Krooi, M., Whittingham, J., & Beausaert, S. (2024). Introducing the 3P Conceptual Model of Internal Quality Assurance in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 82(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101360

Li, B., & Guo, W. (2023). Quality Assessment of Intelligent Physical Education Teaching in Universities Based on Multivariate Statistical Analysis and Regression Analysis. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2023.2.00914

Memarian, B., & Doleck, T. (2024). A Review of Assessment for Learning with Artificial Intelligence. Computers in Human Behavior : Artificial Humans, 2(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100040

Miranda, F. J. (2025). Accreditation and Quality Assurance in Higher Education Institutions: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda. Quality in Higher Education, 31(2), 205-226. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2025.2553983

Nisa, Z., & Shah, M. (2023). Paradigm Shift in Higher Education Institutes from Traditional Teaching to Online Mode Adopted During Covid-19. International Journal of Distance Education and E-Learning, 8(1), 95-108. https://doi.org/10.36261/ijdeel.v8i1.2655

Ocampo, E., Siahaan, K., Sinaga, S., & Cutillas, A. (2023). Pedagogical Exemplars for Mathematics Across Learning Styles. Edunesia Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 4(2), 644-658. https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v4i2.415

Ordofa, S., & Asgedom, H. (2022). School Accountability and its Relationship with Learning Outcomes: A Systematic Literature Review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 6(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100358

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., Stewart, L. A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A. C., Welch, V. A., Whiting, P., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ (British Medical Journal), 372(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Panadero, E., Alqassab, M., Ruiz, J. F., & Ocampo, J. C. (2023). A Systematic Review on Peer Assessment: Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Factors. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(8), 1053-1075. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2164884

Partahian, P., Nisak, K., Lubis, L., Tihawa, T., & Hutagalung, R. (2024). Program Evaluation as a Foundation for Improving Program Quality in Educational Institutions. Edumaspul : Jurnal Pendidikan, 8(1), 734-739. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v8i1.7718

Pastore, S. (2023). Teacher Assessment Literacy: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Education, 8(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1217167

Preiksaitis, C., Barber, R., Caretta‐Weyer, H., Krzyzaniak, S., Chan, T., & Gisondi, M. (2025). Development and Initial Validity Evidence for the Evaler Tool: Assessing Quality of Emergency Medicine Educational Resources. AEM Education and Training, 9(3), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.70063

Priyougie, P., Haq, A., & Rusniati, R. (2024). An Evaluation of the Quality Educational Services in D3 Computerized Accounting at Politeknik Negeri Banjarmasin with the Matrix Method Importance Performance Analysis. PPSDP International Journal of Education, 3(1), 195-203. https://doi.org/10.59175/pijed.v3i1.191

Sánchez, S. J., Martínez, C., & Pérez, M. (2025). A Typology of Sustainability Literacy and Ecological Literacy: A Systematic Literature Review. Frontiers in Education, 10(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1490791

Skedsmo, G., Scheerens, J., & Merki, K. M. (2024). Navigating Data, Evaluation, and Incentives to Improve Educational Outcomes: A Review. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 36(3), 421-440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-024-09447-4

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104(1), 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Son, J. -B., Ružić, N. K., & Philpott, A. (2025). Artificial Intelligence Technologies and Applications for Language Learning and Teaching. Journal of China Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 5(1), 94-112. https://doi.org/10.1515/jccall-2023-0015

Stanley, M., & Hall, K. (2024). A Paradigm Shift for the Nursing Education Model: A Scoping Review. Journal of Nursing Education, 63(3), 141-147. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20240108-08

Tapung, M. (2024). Exploring Future Elementary Teachers' Perspectives on Paradigm Shifts in Social Humanities Education. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Education, Humanities, Health and Agriculture (pp. 1-11). Flores, Indonesia: European Alliance for Innovation.

Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Research in Systematic Reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45

Thường, L. (2024). A Model to Ensure Quality Management of Science and Technology for Autonomous Institutions in Vietnam. Pupil : International Journal of Teaching Education and Learning, 8(2), 49-61. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijtel.2024.82.4961

Townend, G., Alonzo, D., Knipe, S., & Baker, S. (2025). What Does the International Literature Say about Assessment Practice for Equitable Learning Outcomes for Educationally Disadvantaged High School Students?. Frontiers in Education, 10(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1536485

Trujillo, B. P. S., Velarde-Camaqui, D., Nuñez, C. A. G., Silva, E. V. C., & de la Oliva, M. d. P. G. S. (2025). The Current Landscape of Formative Assessment and Feedback in Graduate Studies: A Systematic Literature Review. Frontiers in Education, 10(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1509983

Vlachopoulos, D., & Makri, A. (2024). A Systematic Literature Review on Authentic Assessment in Higher Education: Best Practices for the Development of 21st Century Skills, and Policy Considerations. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 83(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101425

Wakid, M., Nur, R., & Al-Khalid, A. (2024). Learning-Oriented Assessment: A Systematic Literature Review (Network Analysis). Cogent Education, 11(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2366075

Wullschleger, A., Beyer, L., & Maier, J. (2025). Collaboration on School Improvement Under Different Educational Accountability Systems in Two Countries. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 37(1), 87-107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-025-09460-1

Zhong, R., & Zhao, Y. (2025). Education Paradigm Shifts in the Age of AI: A Spatiotemporal Analysis of Learning. Ecnu Review of Education, 8(2), 319-342. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311251315204