Analisis Habits of Mind Mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi Berdasarkan 16 Indikator

Authors

  • Masiah Masiah Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, Fakultas Sains, Teknik, dan Terapan, Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika, Jalan Pemuda Nomor 59A, Mataram, Nusa Tenggara Barat 83125, Indonesia
  • Siti Rabiatul Adawiyah Program Studi Pendidikan Olahraga dan Kesehatan, Fakultas Ilmu Keolahragaan dan Kesehatan Masyarakat, Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika, Jalan Pemuda Nomor 59A, Mataram, Nusa Tenggara Barat 83125, Indonesia
  • Lalu Jaswandi Program Studi Administrasi Pendidikan, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan dan Psikologi, Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika, Jalan Pemuda Nomor 59A, Mataram, Nusa Tenggara Barat 83125, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36312/biocaster.v6i3.1356

Keywords:

Flexible Thinking, Costa and Kallick, Habits of Mind, Biology Education Students, Biology Learning

Abstract

This study analyzes the habits of mind of biology education students based on 16 indicators from Costa and Kallick. The study used a descriptive quantitative approach with 22 purposively selected biology education students as subjects. Data were collected using a validated 4-point Likert scale questionnaire with high reliability (Cronbach's Alpha = 0.88). Data were then analyzed using descriptive statistics, the Friedman test, and Kendall's W test. The results showed that students' habits of mind were in the moderate category and uneven across all indicators. Persistence, empathy, thoroughness, and curiosity were in the high category, while flexible thinking was in the low category. The Friedman test showed significant differences between indicators with a moderate effect size (Kendall's W = 0.32). These findings demonstrate the need for biology learning designs that emphasize the development of flexible thinking through open inquiry, problem-based learning, and metacognitive reflection.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ariyati, E., Susilo, H., Suwono, H., & Rohman, F. (2021). Building Students’ Habits of Mind through Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning. Journal of Physics : Conference Series, 1918(5), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/5/052077

Ariyati, E., Susilo, H., Suwono, H., & Rohman, F. (2024). Promoting Student’s Habits of Mind and Cognitive Learning Outcomes in Science Education. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 10(1), 85-95. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v10i1.31840

Bumiarti, E., Gloria, R. Y., & Roviati, E. (2025). Improving Habits of Mind and Understanding of Wiggins Students through Project-Based Learning Model Assisted by E-LKPD to Biology Learning. International Journal of Contemporary Studies in Education, 4(3), 157-173. https://doi.org/10.56855/ijcse.v4i3.1554

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education (8th ed.). Oxfordshire: Routledge.

Costa, A. L., & Kallick, B. (2008). Learning and Leading with Habits of Mind: 16 Essential Characteristics for Success. Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). California: SAGE Publications.

Field, A. (2018). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). California: SAGE Publications.

Gloria, R. Y., Nurhayati, E., & Yuliyani, R. (2025). Analysis of Habits of Mind through Online Learning in Prospective Biology Teacher. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología, 5(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20251749

Gloria, R. Y., Sudarmin, S., Wiyanto, W., & Indriyanti, D. R. (2018). Costa-Kallick’s Habits of Mind in Practical Activities of Students as Biology Teacher Candidates. Edusains, 10(1), 16-21. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v10i1.7208

Haka, N. B. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Habits of Mind Kelas X melalui Pengembangan Kartu Pintar Biologi dengan Teknologi Augmented Reality. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 13(1), 76-89. https://doi.org/10.17977/um052v13i1p76-89

Haka, N. B., Nisa, K., & Masya, H. (2022). Improving the Habits of Mind of Senior High School Students Toward Biology Learning through Creative Problem-Solving Learning Model Based on Mind Mapping. Assimilation : Indonesian Journal of Biology Education, 5(1), 34-43. https://doi.org/10.17509/aijbe.v5i1.44010

Hidayati, N., & Idris, T. (2020). Students’ Habits of Mind Profiles of Biology Education Department at Public and Private Universities in Pekanbaru, Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 407-418. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13228a

Isfiani, I. R., & Ekanara, B. (2022). Cognitive Anxiety and Habits of Mind: A Study of the Interrelationships with Biology Learning Outcomes. Scientiae Educatia : Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 11(2), 94-106. https://doi.org/10.24235/sc.educatia.v11i2.10909

Muthmainnah, R. (2024). Profil Habits of Mind Mahasiswa Biologi dalam Perkuliahan Teknik Laboratorium. Jurnal Life Science : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 1(2), 14-21. https://doi.org/10.31980/lsciences.v1i2.1752

Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using IBM SPSS (7th ed.). Oxfordshire: Routledge.

Rakhmawati, I., Hasnunidah, N., & Priadi, M. A. (2019). Habits of Mind and Concept Mastery of Cell in Multimedia Virtual Class Environment: A Case of Biology Students in Lampung University. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 20(1), 17-22. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v20i1.pp17-22

Sudarmin, S., Gloria, R. Y., Wiyanto, W., & Indriyanti, D. R. (2017). The Analysis of Costa and Kallick’s Habits of Mind on the Students of Prospective Biology Teachers. Unnes Science Education Journal, 6(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.15294/usej.v6i2.15864

Taber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha when Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48(1), 1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

Downloads

Published

2026-07-06

How to Cite

Masiah, M., Adawiyah, S. R., & Jaswandi, L. (2026). Analisis Habits of Mind Mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi Berdasarkan 16 Indikator. Biocaster : Jurnal Kajian Biologi, 6(3), 1330–1337. https://doi.org/10.36312/biocaster.v6i3.1356