Analisis Perbandingan Capaian Pembelajaran Materi Bioteknologi pada KTSP, Kurikulum 2013, dan Kurikulum Merdeka

Alfira Eka Putri; Amelia Savitri Zairul; Adi Rahmat; Yanti Hamdiyati

doi:10.36312/biocaster.v6i4.1505

Authors

Alfira Eka Putri Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jalan Dr. Setiabudhi Nomor 229, Bandung, Jawa Barat 40154, Indonesia
Amelia Savitri Zairul Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jalan Dr. Setiabudhi Nomor 229, Bandung, Jawa Barat 40154, Indonesia
Adi Rahmat Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jalan Dr. Setiabudhi Nomor 229, Bandung, Jawa Barat 40154, Indonesia
Yanti Hamdiyati Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jalan Dr. Setiabudhi Nomor 229, Bandung, Jawa Barat 40154, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36312/biocaster.v6i4.1505

Keywords:

Biotechnology, Learning Outcomes, KTSP, 2013 Curriculum, Independent Curriculum

Abstract

The curriculum changes from KTSP, 2013 Curriculum, to Merdeka Curriculum show the development of Biology learning direction, including biotechnology material. Biotechnology material is important because it is related to the development of science and technology and its application in the fields of food, health, environment, and daily life. This study aims to analyze the comparison of learning outcomes of biotechnology material in KTSP, 2013 Curriculum, and Merdeka Curriculum based on the form of competency formulation, Operational Verbs (KKO) and cognitive level, material depth, and integration of 21st century competencies. The study uses a qualitative descriptive approach with document analysis techniques. Data were obtained from curriculum documents containing Competency Standards and Basic Competencies in KTSP, Core Competencies and Basic Competencies in 2013 Curriculum, and Learning Outcomes in Merdeka Curriculum. The research results show a shift in the KKO (Competency Based Learning) from identifying, explaining, and stating in the KTSP (Curriculum for Advanced Learning) to more complex KKO, such as analyzing, applying, evaluating, and designing in the 2013 Curriculum and the Independent Curriculum. This shift demonstrates an increase in cognitive demands, shifting from basic understanding and application to analysis, evaluation, and creation. In terms of material depth, the KTSP emphasizes basic concepts and conventional biotechnology, the 2013 Curriculum expands the material to applications and modern biotechnology, while the Independent Curriculum focuses on more contextual and integrative learning through the interconnectedness of concepts, technology, the environment, and real-life issues. The integration of 21st-century competencies is also increasingly strong, demonstrated by an emphasis on critical thinking, creativity, collaboration, communication, problem-solving, scientific literacy, and reflection on bioethical issues. Thus, biotechnology learning outcomes have gradually evolved from an orientation toward mastery of concepts to more complex, contextual, and integrative learning oriented toward the development of 21st-century competencies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anam, K., Sukamto, D. S., & Putri, H. R. (2025). The Influence of the Project Based Learning Model Integrated Independent Curriculum to Results Learn for Students of Class X Biotechnology Material SMK Islam Al-Azhar Jember. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(6), 206-214. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i6.11485

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. London: Longman.

Anggraena, Y., Felicia, N., Hidayat, R., & Pratiwi, I. (2022). Kajian Akademik Kurikulum untuk Pemulihan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Pusat Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran, Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan, Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia.

Arifin, Z. (2017). Konsep dan Model Pengembangan Kurikulum. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Arwasih, A., Hendriawan, D., Mulyasari, E., Bait, E. H., & Nurhayati, N. (2025). Analisis Komparatif Capaian Pembelajaran, Tujuan Pembelajaran, dan Alur Tujuan Pembelajaran Kurikulum Merdeka dengan Kompetensi Inti, Kompetensi Dasar, Silabus dan Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran pada Kurikulum 2013. Kalam Cendekia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 13(1), 383-393. https://doi.org/10.20961/jkc.v13i1.97155

Ernawati, E., Eriyanti, R. W., Rofieq, A., & Huda, A. M. (2024). Analysis of the Development Needs of Student Worksheet Based on Local Wisdom of Biotechnology Material at the Senior High School, Kupang City. Jurnal Pembelajaran dan Biologi Nukleus, 10(1), 26-37. https://doi.org/10.36987/jpbn.v10i1.5315

Fitriana, D. E. N., Amelia, E., & Marianingsih, P. (2017). Penyusunan Modul Pembelajaran Berbasis Sains Teknologi dan Masyarakat (STM) pada Konsep Bioteknologi sebagai Bahan Ajar Siswa SMA Kelas XII. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 10(2), 60-72. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.10-2.8

Lestari, A., Amelia, E., & Marianingsih, P. (2017). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Siswa Berbasis CTL (Contextual Teaching and Learning) sebagai Bahan Ajar Siswa SMA/MA Kelas XII Subkonsep Kultur In Vitro. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 10(1), 32-44. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.10-1.5

Lestariyanti, E., & Listyono, L. (2024). Analisis Capaian Pembelajaran pada Mata Pelajaran Biologi Fase E dan Fase F Kurikulum Merdeka. Spizaetus: Jurnal Biologi dan Pendidikan Biologi, 5(3), 384-394. https://doi.org/10.55241/spibio.v5i3.390

Lutfiani, W., Nida, S., & Yuliati, E. (2021). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar IPA dengan Pendekatan SETS (Science, Environment, Technology and Society) pada Tema Bioteknologi untuk Kelas IX SMP/MTs. Jurnal MIPA dan Pembelajarannya, 1(4), 239-244. https://doi.org/10.17977/um067v1i4p239-244

Martatiyana, D. R., Derlis, A., Aviarizki, H. W., Jurdil, R. R., Andayani, T., & Hidayat, O. S. (2023). Analisis Komparasi Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka dan Kurikulum 2013. Muallimuna: Jurnal Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 9(1), 96-109. https://doi.org/10.31602/muallimuna.v9i1.11600

Mulyasa, E. (2018). Pengembangan dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bandung Barat: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nursanti, T. E., Umniyatie, S., & Yulianti, E. (2016). Analisis Kesinambungan Konsep Bioteknologi dalam Buku Pelajaran Sains/Biologi. Jurnal Edukasi Biologi, 5(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.21831/edubio.v5i1.4475

OECD. (2019). Retrieved June 8, 2026, from OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030: OECD Learning Compass 2030. Interactwebsite: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/about/projects/edu/education-2040/1-1-learning-compass/OECD_Learning_Compass_2030_Concept_Note_Series.pdf

OECD. (2024). Reimagining Education, Realising Potential, International Summit on the Teaching Profession. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Prasetya, C., & Maisarah, M. (2024). The Effect of Chemistry Teaching Materials on Scientific Literacy and Critical Reasoning in SMA Negeri Langsa. IJCER (International Journal of Chemistry Education Research), 8(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.20885/ijcer.vol8.iss1.art1

Purnomo, A. R., Yulianto, B., Mahdiannur, M. A., & Subekti, H. (2023). Embedding Sustainable Development Goals to Support Curriculum Merdeka Using Projects in Biotechnology. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(1), 406-433. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.1.23

Ratnaningsih, S. (2017). Scientific Approach of 2013 Curriculum: Teachers’ Implementation in English Language Teaching. English Review: Journal of English Education, 6(1), 33-40. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v6i1.792

Retnawati, H., Hadi, S., & Nugraha, A. C. (2018). Vocational High School Teachers’ Difficulties in Implementing the Assessment in Curriculum 2013 in Yogyakarta Province of Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 9(1), 33-48. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2016.914a

Rubini, B., Suhartoyo, H., & Permanasari, A. (2018). Apakah Inkuiri Ilmiah Berbasis Investigasi Kelompok Dapat Meningkatkan Kerja Ilmiah dan Literasi Sains Siswa?. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 4(2), 149-157. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v4i2.20780

Salsabilla, A. S., & Purnomo, T. (2026). Pengembangan E-LKPD Berbasis Project Based Learning Materi Bioteknologi untuk Melatih Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik Kelas XII. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi (BioEdu), 15(1), 249-256. https://doi.org/10.26740/bioedu.v15n1.p249-256

Saptono, L. (2016). The Implementation of Scientific Approach in Financial Accounting Learning to Vocational School Students and Its Effects to Students’ Higher-Order Thinking Skills. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 35(2), 235-243. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v15i2.8258

Seland Strata, T. T., Henriksen, E. K., & Jegstad, K. M. (2024). Inquiry-Based Science Education in Science Teacher Education: A Systematic Review. Studies in Science Education, 60(2), 191-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2023.2207148

Siskayanti, W. D., Nurhidayati, S., & Safnowandi, S. (2022). Pengaruh Model Problem Based Instruction Dipadu dengan Teknik Probing Prompting terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Hasil Belajar Kognitif. Panthera : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Sains dan Terapan, 2(2), 94-112. https://doi.org/10.36312/pjipst.v2i2.76

Susilawati, S., Neneng, L., & Miranda, Y. (2016). Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Biologi untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Hasil Belajar Siswa SMA Kelas X. Edu Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematika, 4(2), 104-114. https://doi.org/10.23971/eds.v4i2.513

Suyanto, S. (2017). Pengembangan dan Implementasi Kurikulum dalam Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta Timur: Erlangga.

Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J. M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., El Hayek, S., Augereau-Landais, M., Mourey, F., Feybesse, C., Sundquist, D., & Lubart, T. (2023). Creativity, Critical Thinking, Communication, and Collaboration: Assessment, Certification, and Promotion of 21st Century Skills for the Future of Work and Education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054

Tsai, C.-Y. (2018). The Effect of Online Argumentation of Socio-Scientific Issues on Students' Scientific Competencies and Sustainability Attitudes. Computers & Education, 116, 14-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.009