Evaluasi Program Teaching Factory terhadap Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru Mata Pelajaran Produktif SMKN 1 Tanjung Menggunakan Model Kirkpatrick

Rizza Maria Ulfa; Sy. Mawaddah Al Idrus; Ni Luh Tri Dewi Damayanti; Widi Ikhtiari Ahmad; Muhammad Muhammad; Candra Candra

doi:10.36312/educatoria.v6i3.1314

Authors

Rizza Maria Ulfa Program Studi Magister Administrasi Pendidikan, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Mataram, Jalan Pendidikan Nomor 37, Mataram, Nusa Tenggara Barat 83125, Indonesia
Sy. Mawaddah Al Idrus Program Studi Magister Administrasi Pendidikan, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Mataram, Jalan Pendidikan Nomor 37, Mataram, Nusa Tenggara Barat 83125, Indonesia
Ni Luh Tri Dewi Damayanti Program Studi Magister Administrasi Pendidikan, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Mataram, Jalan Pendidikan Nomor 37, Mataram, Nusa Tenggara Barat 83125, Indonesia
Widi Ikhtiari Ahmad Program Studi Magister Administrasi Pendidikan, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Mataram, Jalan Pendidikan Nomor 37, Mataram, Nusa Tenggara Barat 83125, Indonesia
Muhammad Muhammad Program Studi Magister Administrasi Pendidikan, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Mataram, Jalan Pendidikan Nomor 37, Mataram, Nusa Tenggara Barat 83125, Indonesia
Candra Candra Program Studi Magister Administrasi Pendidikan, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Mataram, Jalan Pendidikan Nomor 37, Mataram, Nusa Tenggara Barat 83125, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36312/educatoria.v6i3.1314

Keywords:

Program Evaluation, Kirkpatrick, Pedagogical Competence, Teaching Factory

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the implementation of the Teaching Factory (TeFa) program in relation to the pedagogical competence of productive subject teachers at SMKN 1 Tanjung using the Kirkpatrick evaluation model. This study employed a qualitative approach through observation, interviews, and documentation. The results indicate that the teaching factory program encourages changes in learning practices toward a more contextual, authentic, and experience-based approach. However, these changes have not been consistently implemented due to limitations at the individual teacher level and institutional support. Evaluation based on the Kirkpatrick model indicates that the program's impact is strongest at the level of reactions and learning, but not yet optimal at the level of behavior and outcomes. These findings confirm that the implementation of the teaching factory has not been fully internalized in daily learning practices. This study concludes that the success of the teaching factory program is not solely determined by the program design but is highly dependent on teachers' reflective ability to continuously reconstruct their pedagogical practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdilah, L., Priadana, M. S., & Juniarti, A. T. (2025). Innovation Capability as Mediator between Competence, Emotional Intelligence, Support, and Lecturer Performance in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Kesatuan, 13(5), 3385-3396. https://doi.org/10.37641/jimkes.v13i5.4078

Adnyana, I. G. K. S., Agustini, K., & Suartama, I. K. (2025). Analisis Sistematis Model dan Implementasi Teaching Factory dalam Pendidikan Vokasi serta Dampaknya terhadap Kesiapan Kerja Siswa SMK. Cetta: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(4), 326-332. https://doi.org/10.37329/cetta.v8i4.4714

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design Choosing among Five Approaches (4th Edition). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Denzin, N. K. (1978). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.

Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Lundgren, H., Bang, A., Justice, S. B., Marsick, V. J., Poell, R. F., Yorks, L., Clark, M., & Sung, S. Y. (2017). Conceptualizing Reﬂection in Experience-Based Workplace Learning. Human Resource Development International, 20(4), 305-326. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2017.1308717

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Nurhasanah, N., Ahman, E., & Yusuf, S. (2022). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Teaching Factory. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(5), 7986-7993. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i5.3723

Rossa, A. T. R., Wibowo, D. A., Pratama, F. M., & Rahmawati, A. F. (2025). Management of Teaching Factory (TeFa) for Achieving Vocational School Graduate Competencies. Journal of Educational Management Research, 4(3), 921-932. https://doi.org/10.61987/jemr.v4i3.1100

Setiadi, A., Rochayati, U., Hartopo, I., & Handito, T. (2025). Production-Based Teaching Factory Learning Model: Enhancing Soft Skills and Simulating the Industrial Environment. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), 6(2), 278-292. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v6i2.4679

Wahjusaputri, S., Nastiti, T. I., Bunyamin, B., Sukmawati, W., & Johan, J. (2024). Development of Teaching Factory Model-Based Artificial Intelligence. Al Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(4), 5173-5183. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i4.5979

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th Ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.