Post-Publication Discussion

Journals provide a platform for readers, researchers, and academics to submit responses and engage in scientific discussions on published articles. This activity aims to strengthen the exchange of ideas, improve the quality of scientific work, and encourage the continuous development of knowledge.

Readers wishing to submit criticisms, questions, clarifications, or evaluations of an article can submit them through a Letter to the Editor or a formal scientific commentary. This input can address aspects of methodology, interpretation of results, analytical accuracy, and the article's scientific contribution.

To maintain balance and objectivity in the discussion, authors of articles receiving responses will be given the opportunity to submit a response or rebuttal (author response/rebuttal). Submitted comments and responses will undergo a peer review process in accordance with the journal's editorial policy.

The journal will consider publication of comments and responses based on their relevance, quality of argumentation, scientific rigor, and contribution to the development of academic discourse. All manuscripts meeting the requirements will be processed based on the Editorial Board's decision, prioritizing the principles of objectivity, integrity, and ethical scientific publications.